Dead Confederates, A Civil War Era Blog

VMFA Chapel Update: Statute of Limitations Edition

Posted in Memory by Andy Hall on January 30, 2015

Earlier this month was the two-year anniversary of one of the most prominent and outspoken of the Virginia Flaggers, Norwood “Tripp” Lewis, being arrested for trespassing on the grounds of the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts in Richmond. Lewis was charged with “trespass after forbidden,” a Class 1 misdemeanor in the Commonwealth of Virginia, just short of a felony. Lewis was detained briefly and then released after being cited.

At the time, there was much shrieking from the Flaggers and their supporters that Lewis and one of his kids had been “roughed up” or “assaulted” by law enforcement. Significantly, though, two of the Flaggers’ prominent members with professional security or law enforcement experience, David Tatum and John Henry Taylor, declined to agree with that assessment.

About a month after Lewis’ arrest, Virginia Flagger Grayson Jennings put out the call for donations for his defense. The Lewis incident was bigger than the issue of one man’s misdemeanor charge, Jennings argued; the case would be an opportunity to vindicate not only Lewis but the Flaggers’ cause itself:


The forthcoming legal proceedings will offer us the chance to challenge the arbitrary and ever-changing restrictions placed on the Flaggers by the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts, and allow a court of law to decide the constitutionality of restricting the display of a Confederate Flag on Virginia State Property, specifically designated as “Confederate Memorial Park.”

It will also allow us the opportunity to further expose the discriminatory and illegal act of the forced removal of Confederate flags from the portico of the Confederate Memorial Chapel and give us grounds to introduce this evidence into the public record via court proceedings and legal filings.


Jennings ended his appeal by including both a mailing address and a PayPal account where people could make donations. The request for funds was repeated in various SCV newsletters and at Dixie Outfitters.

Two months later, Lewis made a deal with prosecutors that the charges would be dropped in exchange for Lewis doing a certain number of hours of community service and agreeing to stay away from the private residences of VMFA officials. (Yes, a court actually had to make that an order.) Interestingly enough, according to Grayson, Lewis had originally wanted to do his community service volunteering at the chapel itself, but the SCV camp that operates it under lease from the VMFA refused — apparently they wanted no part of the Tripp Lewis spectacle, either.

Settling the trespassing case the way he did was a good deal for Lewis, but a terrible one for the Flaggers. Having solicited money to use the criminal case “to further expose the discriminatory and illegal act,” etc., they cannot have been happy when Lewis, looking square in the face of an almost-certain conviction on a serious misdemeanor charge, collapsed like a dollar-store lawn chair and made a deal that avoided a trial altogether. While the Flaggers may see Lewis as “a dedicated warrior in the battle to preserve our Heritage,” there are real limits to his dedication.

Nevertheless, Jennings and the Virginia Flaggers continued to solicit funds for Lewis, “to fund the civil lawsuits that will bring justice to those who have dishonored the Confederate Veterans who lived and died on the grounds of Confederate Memorial Park.” Lewis and the Virginia Flaggers, Jennings claimed, “have only yet begun to fight.” Jennings appended a long list of donors who had already contributed funds, as much as $250 each, to Lewis’ defense fund.

That was twenty-one months ago. Since then, Lewis has repeatedly made loud, boastful talk about filing a civil lawsuit (or several) over this incident, but it doesn’t appear that he has actually done so — which brings us to the significance of this month’s two-year anniversary.

As a general rule, Virginia law imposes a statute of limitations on most civil lawsuits. Specifically, the claims Lewis might conceivably try to make as a plaintiff — assault, personal injury, false imprisonment — all have a limit of two years under Virginia law. Which is to say, that faint bang you heard back on January 12 was the window of opportunity for Lewis to file his oft-threatened lawsuit, slamming shut.

The statute of limitations is not absolute; courts sometimes waive them when there are extenuating circumstances that would have prevented a case being filed within the specified period. In those cases, though, there is a burden for the plaintiff to show why a late claim should go forward; it’s a high bar, and it’s hard to imagine Lewis overcoming it. There is no long paper trail of discovery of evidence to sort through, the basic facts of the case have been well (and publicly) known from the first day, and much of the evidence of the confrontation has been sitting on YouTube for more than two years now. Having boasted for most of those two years about how he’s totally gonna sue and be vindicated on court — totally! — it will be interesting to see Lewis’ (and his supporters’) explanation for his inaction or, more likely, why the statute of limitations supposedly isn’t relevant in this case. It will be even more interesting to see whether the people who contributed their hard-earned money to Lewis’ efforts the “expose the discriminatory and illegal act of the forced removal of Confederate flags from the portico of the Confederate Memorial Chapel. . .” start asking for an accounting of where their money actually went.

Stay tuned, y’all.




8 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Bob Nelson said, on January 30, 2015 at 9:51 pm

    Oh no, not you too Andy. Al, Brooks, Kevin (and others I suppose) give these people more press than they deserve. They are never going to “discuss” or “talk about” any serious CW questions or issues. They have a private agenda that is rooted in bigotry and racism. They are not worth five minutes of my time.

    • Andy Hall said, on January 30, 2015 at 9:53 pm

      I’ve been following the other discussion, as well. Point taken.

      But I will also add that I try to confine my postings regarding the Flaggers (or others) to responding to specific things they’ve said and done. I don’t see my posts as purely gratuitous, although I have no doubt they’d disagree.

  2. Jimmy Dick said, on January 30, 2015 at 9:56 pm

    “While the Flaggers may see Lewis as “a dedicated warrior in the battle to preserve our Heritage,” there are real limits to his dedication.”

    Across America during the Civil Rights movement thousands of men and women of all races, colors, creeds, religions, and beliefs defied unjust laws and “took one for the team.” Some of those people were beaten severely for defying inequality. A few paid the ultimate price for freedom for all with their lives at the hands of racist murderers.

    Tripp Lewis can’t even take a trespassing charge for what he believes in. His ancestors and many of their friends and relatives fought for slavery. That was something they believed in strongly enough to the point where they were willing to die for it on the battlefield.

    Tripp Lewis and the flaggers are an embarrassment to their ancestors. They dishonor the very memory of their ancestors constantly.

  3. Mousy Tongue said, on January 30, 2015 at 10:24 pm

    Wasn’t Lewis doing some of his community service work at Oakwood Cemetery, or trying to? Anyhow, he may be in danger of getting the boot there as well:

    And here’s a semi-recent example of Lewis’ talk about legal plans, posted 10/29/2014 under the handle Conf3derate on that Style Weekly story about his drone:

    As for the lawsuits? They coming along fine. Lots of paperwork that has to be filed in federal cases. Right now the VMFA is looking at 3 of them. I can stand as close to anyone I want @ the VMFA. There are no restrictions.

    Federal cases?

    • Andy Hall said, on January 30, 2015 at 10:35 pm

      He did his community service work, and the trespassing case is over and done. As I say, it’s the best possible outcome for him personally.

      A federal case? He could certainly try that route. But it’s worth remembering that Lewis and his supporters made bold promises about how he was going to fight the criminal case, too, right up to the point where he did a deal. We’ll see if talk translates to action this time.

  4. Leo said, on January 31, 2015 at 11:48 pm

    I’m no lawyer, but isn’t soliciting donations under false pretense fraud?

    • Andy Hall said, on February 1, 2015 at 9:37 am

      I think there was probably every intention of following through in court. But the Flaggers (and Lewis) have a history of popping off about things they don’t really know fully, and I suspect when they got hold of a real attorney he told Lewis he had no credible defense. That’s why he quickly settled the misdemeanor case. Smart for him personally, but it didn’t do anything to further the Flaggers’ cause.

      So I don’t think this rises to the level of “fraud” in a legal sense, but it’s plainly evident that Lewis and the Flaggers have been soliciting lots of money for the purpose of doing things that, two years on, they haven’t followed through on.

      I’m no lawyer, either, but I cannot imagine what claim of injury or loss of “rights” Lewis might claim that would get past a preliminary hearing at either state or federal level. But, as I said, we’ll see.

  5. Spelunker said, on February 2, 2015 at 10:12 am

    At least dollar store lawn chairs have class, but I see where you’re going with it. Thanks for the chuckles.

Leave a Reply to Andy Hall Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: