A while back, Levin mentioned the new Civil War Sesquicentennial website sponsored by the state of North Carolina. It got some great initial reviews, there and elsewhere, particularly for its efforts at telling a more comprehensive story of the war, and in its inclusion of other voices not often included, and left completely out of the Civil War Centennial in 1961-65: those of women, Unionists, African Americans, and so on.
The post wasn’t especially notable, but the exchange of comments that followed was spectacular, largely due to one particular person identifying himself as Michael, who flew off into a rage of indignation at what he perceived as the lack of representation on the commission’s committee by the SCV (this was disputed by other commenters), and the inclusion of what he termed “traitors” (e.g., Union sympathizers, freed slaves enlisted in the USCT) in the story of North Carolina during the war. He analogized North Carolina’s Unionists to both Nazis and hidden al Qaeda terror cells. Michael’s overall point seemed be that, because North Carolina cast its lot with the Confederacy, that state’s sesquicentennial commemoration should reflect a pro-Confederate view, to the exclusion of all others. Michael even took the opportunity to chide Levin, “if you are so interested in the truth, then why would you not see what the Abbeville Institute is teaching.”
Fortunately for Levin and the rest of us, some of the folks associated with the Abbeville Institute have stepped bravely into the breach, and established an alternative website for the “North Carolina War Between the States Sesquicentennial.” (The website is managed by the Cape Fear Historical Institute, whose Board of Directors provides three of the four members of the Academic Board, and whose executive director, Bernhard Thuersam, serves as Commission Chariman.) They’re not looking forward; they’re explicitly looking backward, to the way the centennial was celebrated fifty years ago. The face of the project, featured on the introduction page, is Clyde N. Wilson, one of the prime movers at Abbeville. From Professor Wilson’s introduction (spelling and grammar as in the original):
America in 2011 is a very different country than America in 1961. The long march of cultural Marxism (political correctness) through American institutions, which began in the 1930’s, has achieved most of its objectives. Schools at every level, media, clergy, government agencies, and politicians are now captive to a false dogma of history as conflict between an evil past and the forces of revolution struggling toward a glorious future (This is exactly the way that Karl Marx, who knew nothing about America, described The War).
In regard to the War Between the States, the PC regime means that the demonisation of the South, chronic throughout American history, has re-emerged with a vengeance. The War is a morality play of good versus evil. Sspecifically of the freedom-loving forces of the North heroically and nobly vanquishing Southern traitors fighting with no other motive than to preserve the evil institution of slavery. . . .
It is now established with Soviet party-line rigour that The War was “caused by” and “about” slavery and nothing but slavery. This is not because the interpreters of history in 2011 are more knowledgable than those of 1961. Quite the reverse is true. The new orthodoxy does not result from new knowledge. It is a consequnece of a change in the national discourse because of the rise of PC and because of the obsession of many Americans with race and victimology as the centerpiece of American history. Being on the self-righteous side is also, of course, a disguise for hatred and a desire to dominate others.
It is near certain that the PC version of The War will dominate the public space in the observance to come. It is our opinion that history is far too important to be left to official “experts.” It is OUR history. History is about who we are. . . .
Our Confederate forefathers were not monsters, they were largely brave, honourable, and admirable people who endured greater suffering and sacrifice than any other large group of Americans ever have, and in pursuit of the American principle of self-government. To share their experience with the people of today, all that is needed is to present them in their own words, or in the words of scholars before the age of PC. The purpose of this Sesquicentennial Website is simply to present them as they were. That is all that is needed to destroy the PC version of history for any honest student.
I love it when a screed goes on, paragraph after paragraph, about their opponents’ political correctness (Wilson mentions it six times in 752 words), “cultural Marxism,” “Soviet party-line rigour [sic.],” and “hatred and a desire to dominate others,” and in the same breath argue that it’s those same opponents who are the ones feeding off a sense of victimhood.
On the other hand, Michael must be thrilled.
Snark aside, I don’t doubt that lots of folks who buy into this narrative are e-mailing links to this page to their kids’ teachers right now, encouraging them to look to it for the “truth” about the war. But I also doubt many of them will be fooled.
Update: Third paragraph updated March 17 to acknowledge the Cape Fear Historical Institute as sponsors of the website.
Image: Screen capture of the new “North Carolina War Between the States Sesquicentennial website, showing the diversity of voices represented.